4.6 Article

Pneumocystis cell wall β-glucans stimulate alveolar epithelial cell chemokine generation through nuclear factor-κB-dependent mechanisms

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2004-0300OC

关键词

pneumocystis; alveolar epithelial cells; nuclear factor-kappa B; chemokines

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL62150, R01 HL55934, R01 HL062150] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exuberant inflammatory responses are associated with respiratory failure during Pneumocystis pneumonia. Alveolar epithelial cells (AECs) promote Pneumocystis attachment and proliferation, but also contribute prominently to host cytokine-mediated inflammation during pneumonia. Recent investigations indicate that AECs produce macrophage inflammatory protein-2 (MIP-2) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) following challenge with Pneumocystis carinii. Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) is a ubiquitous transcription factor critical for regulation of proinflammatory cytokine expression. Herein, we assess rat AEC NF-kappa B responses to challenge with a P. carinii P-glucan cell wall component (PCBG). Prominent nuclear translocation of p65 NF-kappa B was demonstrated following PCBG challenge. NF-kappa B activation was in part mediated through Protein Kinase C (PKC) signaling pathways. PCBG challenge of AECs was also shown to induce MIP-2 and TNF-alpha mRNA production, a response that was ameliorated by NF-kappa B inhibition. MIP-2 protein expression was also dramatically increased by PCBG challenge, in a manner that was significantly attenuated by both PKC and NF-kappa B inhibition. The data further demonstrate that AEC chemokine responses were not mediated by the recently described dectin-1 receptor, but instead involved participation of cell surface lactosylceramide. These data support a significant role for AECs in host responses during Pneumocystis pneumonia, and further indicate that beta-glucan induces inflammatory cytokine production through NF-kappa B-dependent mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据