4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Fixed bed gasification of dairy biomass with enriched air mixture

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 525-531

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.072

关键词

Gasification; Enriched air; Dairy biomass; Higher heating value

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concerns over the depletion of fossil fuels and global warming have increased the need for alternative-renewable energy sources. Biomass is one of the renewable and nonconventional energy sources and it also includes municipal solid wastes and animal wastes. Concentrated animal feeding operations produce large quantity of dairy biomass which might result in land and water pollution if left untreated. Different methods are employed to extract the available energy from the dairy biomass which includes co-firing and gasification. Earlier studies on gasification of dairy manure with different steam fuel ratios resulted in increased production of hydrogen. However, the gas mixture has low heat value due to large amount of diluent nitrogen. In order to enhance gas heat values, dairy biomass was gasified in a medium with enriched oxygen varying from 24% to 28% oxygen on volume basis. The effect of enriched air mixture, equivalence ratio and steam fuel ratio on the performance of fixed bed gasifier was studied. Limited studies were done using a mixture of carbon dioxide and oxygen as the gasification medium in order to explore the possibility of complete separation of CO2 and increase the heating value of gas mixture. The results show that the peak temperature and carbon dioxide production increases with corresponding decrease in carbon monoxide with increase in oxygen concentration in the incoming gasification medium. Higher heating value (HHV) of the gases decreases with increase in equivalence ratio (decrease in oxygen concentration). The gases produced using carbon dioxide and oxygen mixture had a higher HHV when compared to that of air and enriched air gasification. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据