4.6 Article

Loading induces site-specific increases in mineral content assessed by microcomputed tomography of the mouse tibia

期刊

BONE
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 1030-1038

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.02.013

关键词

in vivo mechanical loading; bone adaptation; trabecular bone; mice; MicroCT

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [S10RR014801] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [P30AR046121] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adaptation to mechanical loading has been studied extensively in cortical, but not cancellous bone. However, corticocancellous sites are more relevant to osteoporosis and related fracture risk of the hip and spine. We tested the hypotheses that adaptation in a long bone would be greater at cancellous than cortical sites and would depend on the term of daily in vivo cyclic axial loading. We applied compressive loads to the adolescent, 10-week old, male C57BL/6 mouse tibia to examine the skeletal response immediately prior to attainment of peak bone mass. Adaptation was quantified at the completion of either 2-week (n = 8) or 6-week (n = 12) loading terms by directly comparing volumetric bone mineral content between loaded and contralateral limbs by microcomputed tomography. The increase in mineral content was site specific with a greater response found in the corticocancellous proximal metaphysis (14%) than the cortical mid-shaft (2%) after 6 weeks of loading. Furthermore, bone volume fraction and average trabecular thickness of cancellous bone in the proximal tibia increased after 6 weeks by 15% and 12% respectively. Diaphyseal response was only evident proximal to the mid-shaft as indicated by an 8% increase in maximum principal moment of inertia. Both loading terms produced similar results for mineral content, volume fraction, and moments of inertia. Our finding that non-invasive loading increases the bone volume and fraction at a corticocancellous site by as much as 15% motivates exploring the use of mechanical loading to attain greater peak bone mass and inhibit osteoporosis. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据