4.6 Article

Efficacy of pregabalin in neuropathic pain evaluated in a 12-week, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial of flexible- and fixed-dose regimens

期刊

PAIN
卷 115, 期 3, 页码 254-263

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.02.032

关键词

diabetic neuropathy; dosing; neuropathic pain; postherpetic neuralgia; pregabalin; sleep

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pregabalin binds with high affinity to the alpha-delta subunit protein of voltage-gated calcium channels and. thereby, reduces release of excitatory neurotransmitters. This 12-week randomised, double-blind, multicentre. placebo-controlled, parallel-group study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in patients with chronic postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) or painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Patients were randomised to placebo (n=65) or to one of two pregabalin regimens: a flexible schedule of 150, 300, 450, and 600 mg/day with weekly dose escalation based on patients' individual responses and tolerability (n = 141) or a fixed schedule of 300 mg/day for 1 week followed by 600 mg/day for 11 weeks (n = 132). Both flexible- and fixed-dose pregabalin significantly reduced endpoint rnean pain score (primary outcome) versus placebo (P=0.002, P < 0.001) and were significantly superior to placebo in improving pain-related sleep interference (P < 0.001). The most common adverse events (AEs) for pregabalin-treated patients were dizziness. peripheral oedema, weight gain (not affecting diabetes control), and somnolence. These results are consistent with previous studies' demonstrating pregabalin's efficacy, tolerability, and safety for treatment of chronic neuropathic pain associated with DPN or PHN, Pregabalin dosingainied at optimal balance of efficacy and tolerability provides significant pain relief and may reduce risks for AEs and therapy discontinuation. (c) 2005 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据