4.6 Article

Neuroprotection against focal ischemic brain injury by inhibition of c-Jun N-terminal kinase and attenuation of the mitochondrial apoptosis-signaling pathway

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600062

关键词

Bax; Bim; caspase-3; caspase-9; cytochrome c

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS38560, NS36736, NS45048, NS43802] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) is an important stress-responsive kinase that is activated by various forms of brain insults. In this study, we have examined the role of JNK activation in neuronal cell death in a murine model of focal ischemia and reperfusion; furthermore, we investigated the mechanism of JNK in apoptosis signaling, focusing on the mitochondrial-signaling pathway. We show here that JNK activity was induced in the brain 0.5 to 24h after ischemia. Systemic administration of SP600125, a small molecule JNK-specific inhibitor, diminished JNK activity after ischemia and dose-dependently reduced infarct volume. c-Jun N-terminal kinase inhibition also attenuated ischemia-induced expression of Bim, Hrk/DP5, and Fas, but not the expression of Bcl-2 or FasL. In strong support of a role for JNK in promoting the mitochondrial apoptosis-signaling pathway, JNK inhibition prevented ischemia-induced mitochondrial translocation of Bax and Bim, release of cytochrome c and Smac, and activation of caspase-9 and caspase-3. The potential mechanism by which JNK promoted Bax translocation after ischemia was further studied using coimmunoprecipitation, and the results revealed that JNK activation caused serine phosphorylation of 14-3-3, a cytoplasmic sequestration protein of Bax, leading to Bax disassociation from 14-3-3 and subsequent translocation to mitochondria. These results confirm the role of JNK as a critical cell death mediator in ischemic brain injury, and suggest that one of the mechanisms by which JNK triggers the mitochondrial apoptosis-signaling pathway is via promoting Bax and Bim translocation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据