4.5 Article

The number of human peripheral blood CD4+ CD25high regulatory T cells increases with age

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 140, 期 3, 页码 540-546

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02798.x

关键词

ageing; regulatory T cell

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ageing is associated with evidence of immune deficiency and dysregulation. Key changes in the immune system with ageing include a progressive reduction in naive T cell output associated with thymic involution and peripheral expansion of oligoclonal memory T cells. These features are associated with evidence of impaired immune responsiveness both in vitro and in vivo, termed immune senescence. CD4(+) CD25(+) T cells have recently been recognized as mediators of peripheral immune regulation and play a role in the control of autoimmune and pathogen-specific immune responses. The significance of CD4(+) CD25(+) regulatory T cells in the context of immunosenescence is not known. We have investigated the number, phenotype and function of CD4(+) CD25(+) T cells in healthy volunteers over a wide age range. We demonstrate that the number of CD4(+) CD25(+) and CD4(+) CD25(high) T cells in healthy volunteers increases with age. In both age groups CD4(+) CD25(+) T cells showed a phenotype consistent with that described for regulatory T cells. Further analysis of CD4(+) CD25(high) T cells in young and elderly donors showed equivalent expression of intracellular CTLA-4 and surface expression of activation markers. In vitro, functional titration assays of CD4(+) CD25(high) T cells demonstrated equivalent regulatory function in both young and elderly donors, with suppression of proliferation and cytokine production in response to polyclonal T cell stimulation. These observations demonstrate an increase in peripheral blood CD4(+) CD25(high) regulatory T cells associated with ageing. The relevance of these expanded cells in relation to the immune senescence seen in the elderly as yet remains unclear.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据