4.5 Article

VEGF-A splice variants and related receptor expression in human skeletal muscle following submaximal exercise

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 98, 期 6, 页码 2137-2146

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01402.2004

关键词

vascular endothelial growth factor; angiogenesis; ischemia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

VEGF-A contributes to muscle tissue angiogenesis following aerobic exercise training. The temporal response of the VEGF-A isoforms and their target receptors has not been comprehensively profiled in human skeletal muscle. We combined submaximal exercise with and without reduced leg blood flow to establish whether ischemia-induced metabolic stress was an important physiological stimuli responsible for regulating the VEGF-A system in humans. Nine healthy men performed two 45-min bouts of one-leg knee-extension exercise, with and without blood flow restriction. Muscle biopsies were obtained at rest and 2 and 6 h after exercise. Expression ( mRNA) of the VEGF-A splice variants and related receptors [ VEGF receptor ( VEGFR)-1, VEGFR-2, and neuropilin-1] was determined by using qPCR. VEGF-A(total) expression increased more robustly after exercise with reduced blood flow, and initially this principally reflected an increase in VEGF-A(165). Six hours after exercise, there was a relatively greater increase in VEGF-A(189), and this response was not influenced by blood flow conditions. VEGFR-1 mRNA expression increased 2 h after exercise, and neuropilin-1 expression was transiently reduced, while all three receptors increased by 6 h. There was no evidence for the expression of the inhibitory VEGF-A(165B) variant in human skeletal muscle. Our study, reflecting both VEGF-A ligand and receptors, implicates metabolic perturbation as a regulator of human muscle angiogenesis and demonstrates that VEGF-A splice variants are distinctly regulated. Our findings also indicate that all three receptor genes exhibit different pretranslational regulation, in response to exercise in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据