4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Effects of sound bandwidth on fMRI activation in human auditory brainstem nuclei

期刊

HEARING RESEARCH
卷 204, 期 1-2, 页码 101-110

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.01.005

关键词

functional imaging; human auditory processing; cochlear nucleus; superior olivary complex; inferior colliculus

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [T32DC00038, P30DC005209, P01DC00119, T32 DC000038, P01 DC000119-260023, P30 DC005209] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Few neuro-imaging studies of the auditory system have examined the dependence of brain activation on sound bandwidth, a fundamental stimulus parameter, and none have examined bandwidth dependencies in the brainstem. The present study examined the effect of bandwidth on human brainstem activation using fMRI, an indicator Of Population neural activity. The studied stimuli (broadband, two-. one-. and third-octave continuous noise) activated three brainstem centers: cochlear nucleus, superior olivary complex, and inferior colliculus. Activation could be confidently attributed to these nuclei because it was appropriately punctate (given the small size of the imaged nuclei) and appropriately located (as determined from histological atlases). Activation in all three imaged centers increased monotonically with increasing bandwidth when either Stimulus spectrum level or energy was held constant. Supplementary experiments indicated that the measured bandwidth dependencies were not contaminated by the extraneous sounds produced by the scanner. Increases in fMRI activation with increasing bandwidth would be expected from Populations of neurons having a single best frequency and only excitatory responses to sound, but not necessarily from lower auditory system neurons with their often more complex responses. Our results provide basic information for designing auditory neuro-imaging studies that need to control for, or manipulate sound bandwidth. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据