4.7 Article

Synovial tissue macrophages: a sensitive biomarker for response to treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

期刊

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
卷 64, 期 6, 页码 834-838

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2004.029751

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Previous work identified synovial sublining macrophage numbers as a potential biomarker for clinical efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis. Objective: To investigate the association between changes in infiltration of synovial macrophages and clinical improvement after antirheumatic treatment. Methods: 88 patients who participated in various clinical trials were studied. All patients underwent serial arthroscopy before initiation of treatment and after different time intervals. Immunohistochemical and digital image analysis were performed according to standardised procedures to detect changes in CD68+ synovial sublining macrophages in relationship to changes in the 28 joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28). Statistical analysis was performed using one way analysis of variance, the independent samples t test, linear regression, and the standardised response mean (SRM). Results: For good, moderate, and non-responders, according to the DAS28 response criteria, there was a significant difference in the change in sublining macrophages ( mean (SEM) cells/mm(2) -643 ( 124), -270 ( 64), and -95 ( 60), respectively; p< 0.0003). There was a significant correlation between the change in the number of macrophages and the change in DAS28 ( Pearson correlation 0.874, p< 0.01). The change in sublining macrophages explained 76% of the variation in the change in DAS28 ( p< 0.02). The sensitivity to change of the biomarker was high in patients treated actively (SRM >0.8), whereas the ability to detect changes in placebo treated patients was weak (SRM <0.3). Conclusion: The results suggest that changes in synovial sublining macrophages can be used to predict possible efficacy of antirheumatic treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据