4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

The ex utero intrapartum therapy procedure for high-risk fetal lung lesions

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
卷 40, 期 6, 页码 1038-1044

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.03.024

关键词

prenatal diagnosis; cystic adenomatoid malformation of lung volume ratio (CVR); fetal lung lesion; hydrops fetalis; fetal intervention; ex utero intrapartum therapy (EXIT) procedure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Indications for the ex utero intrapartum therapy (EXIT) procedure have expanded to include any fetal anomaly in which resuscitation of the neonate may be compromised. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 9 patients after resection of lung lesions during the EXIT procedure. Results: The mean gestational age at EXIT procedure was 35.4 weeks. All lung masses maintained large sizes late into gestation with mean mass volume/head circumference ratio of 2.5 at presentation and 2.2 at EXIT. Seven of 9 fetuses demonstrated hydropic changes (n = 6) and/or polyhydramnios (n = 5), and underwent prenatal intervention including thoracentesis, thoracoammotic shunt placement, amnioreduction, and/or betamethasone administration. Overall survival after EXIT for lung mass resection was 89%. The average time on placental bypass was 65 minutes. Postnatal complications included reoperation for air leak (n = 1), reoperation for bleeding (n = 1), and death from sepsis and prematurity (n = 1). Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was used in 4 neonates for persistent pulmonary hypertension. Maternal prenatal complications included polyhydramnios (n = 5), preterm labor (n = 4), and chorioamnionitis (n = 1). One mother required perioperative blood transfusion. Conclusion: The EXIT procedure allows for controlled resection of large fetal lung lesions at delivery, avoiding acute respiratory decompensation related to mediastinal shift, air trapping, and compression of normal lung. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据