4.7 Article

Nonproliferating CML CD34+ progenitors are resistant to apoptosis induced by a wide range of proapoptotic stimuli

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 19, 期 6, 页码 1034-1041

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403724

关键词

chronic myelogenous leukemia; imatinib mesylate; apoptosis; hematopoietic progenitors; drug combinations

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA95684] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [5M01 RR00043] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Imatinib mesylate, a Bcr-Abl kinase inhibitor, has been very successful in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). However, the majority of patients achieving cytogenetic remissions with imatinib treatment have molecular evidence of persistent disease, and residual BCR/ABL(+) progenitors can be detected. There is a need to develop new approaches that enhance elimination of malignant progenitors in imatinib-treated patients. Here we show that CML CD34(+) progenitors are sensitive to several apoptosis-inducing stimuli including the chemotherapeutic agents Ara-C and VP-16, radiation, arsenic trioxide, ceramide, growth factor withdrawal, and the death receptor activators TNF alpha and TRAIL. Bcr-Abl kinase inhibition by imatinib did not enhance sensitivity of CML progenitors to Ara-C, VP-16, ceramide, radiation or TRAIL-induced apoptosis but did enhance arsenic and TNF alpha-induced apoptosis. We further demonstrate that apoptosis was restricted to dividing cells, whereas nonproliferating BCR/ABL(+) CD34(+) cells were resistant to apoptosis induced by imatinib, Ara-C or arsenic, either alone or in combination. Resistance of quiescent CML progenitors to imatinib-induced apoptosis could contribute to persistence of residual malignant progenitors in imatinib-treated patients. Combination treatment with Ara-C or arsenic may not enhance targeting of nonproliferating CML progenitors. The assay described here may be useful for identifying agents targeting quiescent CML progenitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据