4.7 Article

Spontaneous stroke in a genetic model of hypertension in mice

期刊

STROKE
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 1253-1258

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000167694.58419.a2

关键词

hemorrhage; hypertension; stroke, acute

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL62984, HL55006, HL16066] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS24621] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose - Hypertension is the most common risk factor for hemorrhagic stroke. An experimental model of stroke, the stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHRSP), which has been enormously useful in studies of cerebral circulation, has been used in > 1000 papers. However, SHRSP usually have an ischemic or less commonly hemorrhagic stroke in the cortex, not in the brain stem, cerebellum, or basal ganglia, as in patients with hypertension. The goal of this study was to develop a model of hemorrhagic stroke in hypertensive mice. Methods - A genetic model of hypertensive mice, double transgenic mice ( R+/A(+)) that overexpress both human renin (R+) and human angiotensinogen (A(+)), and nonhypertensive control mice were divided into 3 groups: ( 1) high-salt diet; ( 2) N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthases, in drinking water; and ( 3) high-salt diet and L-NAME. Results - All R+/A(+) mice on high-salt diet and L-NAME died within 10 weeks, with hemorrhage in the brain stem, and several of the mice had hemorrhages in brain stem, cerebellum, and basal ganglia. No control mice on high-salt diet and L-NAME had hemorrhagic stroke. Arterial pressure in R+/A(+) mice increased progressively during high-salt diet and L-NAME. In R+/A(+) and control mice, high-salt diet or L-NAME alone did not increase arterial pressure. Conclusions - We now describe the first model of spontaneous hemorrhagic strokes in hypertensive mice. The type and locations of stroke are reasonably similar to those observed in patients with hypertension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据