4.2 Article

Ultrafiltration improves aortic compliance in haemodialysis patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION
卷 19, 期 6, 页码 439-444

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001813

关键词

haemodialysis; systolic hypertension; augmentation index; pulse wave velocity; compliance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An elevated pulse pressure leads to an increased pulsatile cardiac load, and results from arterial stiffening. The aim of our study was to test whether a reduction in volume overload by ultrafiltration ( UF) during haemodialysis ( HD) leads to an improvement of aortic compliance. In 18 patients, aortic compliance was estimated noninvasively before and after HD with UF using a pulse pressure method based on the Windkessel model. This technique has not been applied before in a dialysis population, and combines carotid pulse contour analysis by applanation tonometry with aortic outflow measurements by Doppler echocardiography. The median UF volume was 2450 ml ( range 1000 - 4000 ml). The aortic outflow volume after HD ( 39 ml; 32 - 53 ml) was lower ( P = 0.01) than before ( 46 ml; 29 - 60 ml). Carotid pulse pressure after HD ( 42 mmHg; 25 - 85 mmHg) was lower ( P = 0.01) than before ( 46 mmHg; 35 - 93 mmHg). Carotid augmentation index after HD ( 22%; 3 - 30%) was lower ( P = 0.001) than before ( 31%; 7 - 53%). Carotid femoral pulse wave velocity was not different after HD ( 8.7 m/ s; 5.6 - 28.9 m/ s vs 7.7 m/ s; 4.7 - 36.8 m/ s). Aortic compliance after HD ( 1.10 ml/ mmHg; 0.60 - 2.43 ml/ mmHg) was higher ( P = 0.02) than before ( 1.05 ml/ mmHg; 0.45 - 1.69 ml/ mmHg). The increase in aortic stiffness in HD patients is partly caused by a reversible reduction of aortic compliance due to volume expansion. Volume withdrawal by HD moves the arterial wall characteristics back to a more favourable position on the nonlinear pressure - volume curve, reflected in a concomitant decrease in arterial pressure and improved aortic compliance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据