4.8 Article

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 is a component of the oncogenic T-cell factor-4/β-catenin complex

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 128, 期 7, 页码 1919-1936

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.007

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: T-cell factor (TCF)-4 regulates a certain set of genes related to growth and differentiation of intestinal epithelial cells. Aberrant transactivation of these TCF-4-regulated genes by beta-catenin protein plays a crucial role in early intestinal carcinogenesis, and the transcriptional machinery of the TCF-4/beta-catenin complex is likely to contain targets for molecular therapy. We explored the molecular composition of the TCF-4/beta-catenin transcriptional complex by means of proteomics. Methods & Results: A protein of approximately 112 kilodaltons was consistently coimmunoprecipitated with FLAG-tagged TCF-4 transiently expressed in HEK293 cells, and the protein was identified by mass spectrometry as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1). PARP-1 physically interacted with TCF-4 and augmented the transcriptional activity of the beta-catenin/TCF-4 complex. Knockdown of PARP-1 by RNA interference significantly suppressed both transcriptional activity and proliferation by colorectal cancer cells. Auto-polyADP-ribosylation of the PARP-1 protein induced by DNA damage inhibited the functional interaction of PARP-1 with TCF-4. PARP-1 was overexpressed in the intestinal adenomas of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and multiple intestinal polyposis mice. The expression of PARP-1 was closely associated with the accumulation of beta-catenin and with the undifferentiated status of intestinal epithelial cells. Conclusions: In this study, we identified PARP-1 as a novel coactivator of the beta-catenin/TCF-4 complex. Although PARP-1 has been believed to play a protective role against carcinogenesis, these expression patterns and functional properties of PARP-1 were highly suggestive of its participation in early colorectal carcinogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据