4.5 Article

Treatment of peri-implantitis by the Vector® system -: A pilot study

期刊

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 288-293

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01141.x

关键词

curettes; peri-implantitis; randomized controlled clinical trial; ultrasonic instrument; Vector((R)) system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of treatment of peri-implantitis with a novel ultrasonic device, the Vector((R)) system, with that of subgingival debridement with carbon fiber curettes. Material and methods: The study, comprising 11 patients with at least two screw type implants with bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD)>= 5 mm, and at least 1.5 mm radiographic bone loss and exposed implant threads, was carried out as a single blind randomized clinical trial. At baseline one randomly chosen implant in each patient was treated by the Vector((R)) system (test) while the other implant (control) was treated by submucosal debridement with a carbon fiber curette. After 3 months, the same treatments were repeated. Plaque, BOP, and PPD were recorded on all implant surfaces at baseline, and after 3 and 6 months. Bone levels were recorded on radiographs taken prior to the start of the study, and after 6 months. Results: Oral hygiene around both test and control implants was improved at 3 and 6 months compared with baseline. At 6 months, four of the Vector((R))-treated sites, and only one site treated with curettes, had stopped to bleed. In neither the test nor the control group, were there any differences between baseline and 6 months regarding PPD and bone levels. Conclusion: Although there was a greater reduction in the number of sites with BOP following treatment with the Vector((R)) system than following instrumentation with carbon fiber curettes, there was no significant difference between the two methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据