4.5 Article

Efficacy of three ethanol-based hand rubs against feline calicivirus, a surrogate virus for norovirus

期刊

JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION
卷 60, 期 2, 页码 144-149

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.12.005

关键词

feline calicivirus; efficacy; fingerpad; hand rub; ethanol; norovirus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the efficacy of three ethanol-based hand rubs (Sterillium Virugard, 95% ethanol; Sterillium Rub, 80% ethanol; Desderman N, 75.1% ethanol) against feline calicivirus (FCV), the surrogate virus for norovirus, on artificially contaminated hands of healthy volunteers. The ASTM E 1838-02 standard was used. Experiments were controlled with 70% ethanol and 70% propan-1-ol. which were previously found to have maximal. efficacy against FCV. In the first step, three different organic loads (5% fetal bovine serum, 5% faecal. suspension and the tripartite ASTM load) were compared. A significant influence of the type of organic load was found (P < 0.001, ANOVA). In the second step, the hand rubs were investigated with a 5% faecal suspension as a challenging organic toad. The hand rub based on 95% ethanol was more effective than those based on 70% ethanol (mean log(10) reduction factor: 2.17 vs. 1.56; P=0.17) and 70% propan-1-ol (mean RF: 1.63 vs. 0.95; P=0.0003). The hand rub based on 80% ethanol was also more effective than those based on 70% ethanol (mean RF: 1.25 vs. 1.03: P=0.20) and 70% propan-1-ol (mean RF: 1.43 vs. 1.09; P=0.03). The hand rub based on 75.1% ethanol. was less effective than those based on 70% ethanol (mean RF: 1.07 vs. 1.27; P=0.47) and 70% propan-1-ol. (mean RF: 0.78 vs. 0.97; P=0.35). Based on our data, ethanol has superior efficacy against FCV than propan-1-ol. In addition, a higher ethanol concentration in three commercially available hand rubs was associated with better efficacy against FCV. (c) 2004 The Hospital. Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据