4.5 Article

Cognitive and educational outcomes in early adulthood for infants weighing 1000 grams or less at birth

期刊

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
卷 94, 期 6, 页码 733-740

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1080/08035250510025987

关键词

premature infants; extremely-low-birthweight infants; follow-up studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: To assess the intelligence quotient ( IQ) and academic achievement in early adulthood of a cohort of extremely-low-birthweight (ELBW <= 1000 g) subjects. Methods: All 82 ELBW survivors consecutively born in or referred to a single tertiary center in 1976 - 1981 were traced at a mean age of 18 y. Three disabled children had died. Fifty-nine subjects ( 75%) had their IQ tested and 69 ( 87%) responded to a questionnaire. They were compared to 44 term, normal birthweight ( NBW) matched controls. Outcome measures were: IQ ( Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) and educational outcome. The main outcome variables were compared between groups and analyzed for neonatal and demographic data and in the ELBW group for childhood data. Results: There was a strong relationship (r(2) = 0.55, p < 0.0001) between childhood and adult IQ for the 41 ELBW subjects tested at both ages (6.1 +/- 1.3 and 18.4 +/- 1.9 y). Differences were significant between ELBW and NBW groups: in mean full-scale IQ (94 +/- 12 vs 108 +/- 14), verbal IQ ( 93 +/- 12 vs 106 +/- 14) and performance IQ ( 97 +/- 14 vs 109 +/- 16) ( < 0.0001). Differences between ELBW and NBW groups in prevalence of IQ < 85 ( 19 vs 2%, p = 0.012), of schooling in a regular curriculum for age ( 36 vs 68%, p = 0.0011), of requirement for special classes or schools ( 33 vs 9%, p = 0.0032), and of obtainment of secondary school diploma for those 18 y or older ( 56 vs 85%, p = 0.018) were largely due to fathers' socioeconomic score. Conclusion: ELBW subjects had a mean adult IQ in the normal range; however, it was one standard deviation below that of NBW subjects and they had more school failures. Despite this, more than half of ELBW subjects aged 18 y or more had obtained their secondary school diploma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据