4.4 Article

Finite Element Analysis of Progressive Failure and Strain Localization of Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composite Laminates by ABAQUS

期刊

APPLIED COMPOSITE MATERIALS
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 711-731

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10443-014-9432-1

关键词

Composite laminates; Progressive failure; Strain localization; Cohesive model; Finite element analysis (FEA)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Funding of China [51375435]
  2. National Key Fundamental Research and Development Project [2015CB057603]
  3. Natural Science Funding of Zhejiang Province of China [LY13E050002]
  4. Aerospace Support Technique and Innovation Funding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interaction mechanism between the intralaminar damage and interlaminar delamination of composite laminates is always a challenging issue. It is important to consider the progressive failure and strain softening behaviors simultaneously during the damage modeling and numerical simulation of composites using FEA. This paper performs three-dimensional finite element analysis of the progressive failure and strain localization of composites using FEA. An intralaminar progressive failure model based on the strain components is proposed and the nonlinear cohesive model is used to predict the delamination growth. In particular, the nonlocal integral theory which introduces a length scale into the governing equations is used to regularize the strain localization problems of composite structures. Special finite element codes are developed using ABAQUS to predict the intralaminar and interlaminar damage evolution of composites simultaneously. The carbon fiber/epoxy composite laminates with a central hole demonstrates the developed theoretical models and numerical algorithm by discussing the effects of the mesh sizes and layups patterns. It is shown the strain localization problem can be well solved in the progressive failure analysis of composites when the energy dissipation due to the damage of the fiber, matrix and interface occurs at a relatively wide area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据