4.7 Article

The effect of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation on left ventricular functional recovery early after acute myocardial infarction: a randomized experimental magnetic resonance imaging study

期刊

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 26, 期 12, 页码 1235-1241

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi137

关键词

intra-aortic balloon pump; magnetic resonance imaging; myocardial infarction; myocardial stunning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims We sought to determine whether intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation improves the recovery of left ventricular (LV) systolic function after reperfused acute myocardial infarction (AN). Methods and results Fourteen dogs underwent 90-min coronary artery occlusion followed by reperfusion. Seven animals were randomized to IABP counterpulsation immediately after reperfusion. Tagged, cine, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were used for regional and global LV functional assessment and MI characterization, respectively. Image acquisition was performed at 1 h, 6 h, and 24 h after reperfusion, during which the IABP device was paused. Animals randomized to IABP demonstrated an earlier improvement of LV ejection fraction when compared with controls (25 +/- 3 vs. 25 +/- 2% at 1 h, P = 0.91; 36 +/- 3 vs. 26 +/- 2% at 6 h, P = 0.015; and 38 +/- 3 vs. 35 +/- 1% at 24 h, P = 0.34). Regional functional analyses revealed the same behaviour among non-infarcted risk regions, i.e., earlier circumferential systolic strain improvement in the IABP group than in controls (- 5.4 +/- 0.4 vs. - 5.3 +/- 0.5% at 1 h, P = 0.86; - 12.1 +/- 1.0 vs. -6.0 +/- 0.4% at 6 h, P < 0.001; and - 13.9 +/- 1.1% vs. - 12.8 +/- 0.6% at 24 h, P = 0.40). Importantly, however, the degree of LV functional recovery 24 h after reperfusion was similar whether IABP counterpulsation was used or not. Conclusion IABP counterpulsation accelerates but does not significantly improve the recovery of LV systolic function after reperfused AMI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据