4.6 Article

Treatment of HIV-1-associated Kaposi's sarcoma with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and HAART simultaneously induces effective tumor remission and CD4+T cell recovery

期刊

INFECTION
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 140-147

出版社

MMV MEDIEN & MEDIZIN VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.1007/s15010-005-4099-z

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The combination of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and liposomal doxorubicin is a promising approach for the treatment of progressive HIV-related Kaposi's sarcoma (KS). Here, we determined the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Liposomal doxorubicin and HAART as a combined treatment approach for advanced KS, and assessed the impact of liposomal doxorubicin on HAART-mediated immune reconstitution and viral suppression. Patients and Methods: In an uncontrolled observational trial, KS treatment responses were assessed in 54 HIV-1-infected patients with advanced KS according to ACTG criteria. Immunological and virological treatment responses were compared to 54 non-KS-affected HIV-1 patients who were individually matched to the study participants according to sex, age ( 5 years), CD4+ T cell count (+/- 25%), HIV RNA toad (+/- 25%) and previous antiretroviral therapy exposure. Results: In 81.5% of the study patients, complete or partial responses were observed within a median of 8 weeks. Treatment-related side effects were predominantly confined to leukopenia (44.4% of patients) and mild-to-moderate liver enzyme elevation (22.3% of patients). Relative CD4+ T cell counts increased to a similar degree both in study patients and matched pairs (7% vs 6%, respectively), yet, absolute CD4+ T cell counts augmented considerably stronger in chemotherapy-naive matched pairs than in the study patients. Conclusion: The simultaneous administration of HAART and liposomal doxorubicin is a safe and effective treatment approach for advanced KS and HAART-mediated recovery of relative CD4+ T cell counts does not seem to be impaired by concomitant treatment with liposomal doxorubicin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据