4.7 Article

Autoradiographic localisation of [3H]2-BFI imidazoline I2 binding sites in mouse brain

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 516, 期 2, 页码 139-144

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.04.006

关键词

imidazoline I-2 binding site; [H-3]2-BFI; autoradiography; MAO-B; brain; (mouse)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Imidazoline 12 binding sites are heterogeneous in nature and have been observed in the brain of a number of species. Development of specific imidazoline 12 radioligands, such as [H-3]2-BFI and [H-3]BU224, that have a high affinity for the imidazoline I-2 binding site, has enabled the central distribution of these sites to be mapped. Extensive studies have been conducted on the rat brain with a number of radioligands. However, to date a comprehensive analysis of imidazoline 12 ligand binding in mouse brain has not been completed. In the present work we describe levels Of [H-3]2-BFI specific binding found throughout the mouse brain. [H-3]2-BFI (2 nM) showed discrete regional distribution which was readily displaced by saturating concentrations of the specific imidazoline 12 ligand BU224. The highest level S Of [H-3]2-BFI specific binding were found in the dorsal raphe, paraventricular thalamus and nucleus accumbens. Moderate levels were found throughout the lining of the aqueduct, lateral ventricle, lateral 4th ventricle, 4th ventricle, 3rd ventricle, but not the dorsal 3rd ventricle. Based on the loss Of [H-3]idazoxan binding in brain homogenates from monoamine oxidase-A and B (MAO-A and MAO-B) deficient mice it has been suggested that imidazoline 12 binding sites are predominantly on MAO. Consistent with this hypothesis the regional distribution of [H-3]2-BFI shows some overlap with that previously reported for MAO. However, in the rat imidazoline 12 binding sites have been shown to be heterogeneous in nature and it is likely [H-3]2-BFI is binding to multiple imidazoline 12 binding sites within mouse brain. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据