4.6 Article

Thromboelastography maximum amplitude predicts postoperative thrombotic complications including myocardial infarction

期刊

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
卷 100, 期 6, 页码 1576-1583

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000155290.86795.12

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Postoperative thrombotic complications increase hospital length of stay and health care costs. Given the potential for thrombotic complications to result from hypercoagulable states, we sought to determine whether postoperative blood analysis using thromboelastography could predict the occurrence of thrombotic complications, including myocardial infarction (MI). We prospectively enrolled 240 patients undergoing a wide variety of surgical procedures. A cardiac risk score was assigned to each patient using the established revised Goldman risk index. Thromboelastography was performed immediately after surgery and maximum amplitude (MA), representing clot strength, was determined. Postoperative thrombotic complications requiring confirmation by a diagnostic test were assessed by a blinded observer. Ten patients (4.2%) suffered a total of 12 postoperative thrombotic complications. The incidence of thrombotic complications with increased MA (8 of 95 = 8.4%) was significantly (P = 0.0157) more frequent than chat of patients with MA <= 68 (2 of 145 = 1.4%), Furthermore, the percentage suffering postoperative MI in the increased MA group (6 of 95 = 6.3%) was significantly larger than that in the MA <= 68 group (0 of 145 = 0%) (P = 0.0035). In a multivariate analysis, increased MA (P = 0.013; odds ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.20) and Goldman risk score (11 = 0,046; odds ratio, 2,39; 95% confidence interval, 1,02-5.61) both independently predicted postoperative Mi. A postoperative hypercoagul able state as determined by thromboelastography is associated with postoperative thrombotic complications, including MI, in a diverse group Of Surgical patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据