4.3 Article

Correlation between viability of pollination and length of basal dehiscence of the theca in rice under a hot-and-humid condition

期刊

PLANT PRODUCTION SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 109-114

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1626/pps.8.109

关键词

dehiscence of anther; flowering; high temperature; hot-and-humid condition; pollination; rice; tolerance

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anticipated global warming may increase the floret sterility of rice (Oryza sativa L.). For selection of genotypes tolerant to high temperatures during the flowering period, it is important to identify morphological traits associated with tolerance to temperature stress. This Study investigated the relationship between the length of dehiscence at the basal part of thecae and the viability of pollination in 18 cultivars of rice subjected to a hot-and-humid condition (37/25 degrees C, day/night, > 90% relative humidity) for three days at flowering. Control plants were left under the ambient conditions in a semi-cylindrical house covered with cheesecloth (30% shading; temperature range: 24-35 degrees C). The length of basal dehiscence of thecae and the number of pollen grains on the stigmata were examined with a light microscope after flowering. The length strongly correlated with the percentage of florets having more than 80 pollen grains on the stigmata under the ambient condition (r = 0.72, P < 0.001), and with the percentage of florets having more than 20 pollen grains on the stigmata tinder the hot condition (r = 0.93, P < 0.001). In other words, the length correlated with pollination viability or reliability under both conditions. In addition, basal dehiscence was shorter in the non-japonica-type cultivars than in many of the japonica-type cultivars under both conditions. We concluded that the low pollination viability in the non-japonica, type cultivars is associated with their small basal dehiscence on the thecae, and the length of basal dehiscence can be used as a selection marker of high temperature tolerance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据