4.7 Article

Competitive sorption/desorption of Zn, Cd, Pb, Ni, Cu, and Cr by clay-bearing mining wastes

期刊

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
卷 65-66, 期 -, 页码 6-13

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2012.06.006

关键词

Kaolinite-bearing mining waste; Smectite-basalt weathering waste; Competitive sorption; Desorption; Retention

资金

  1. AGH University of Science and Technology [11.11.140]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The competitive sorption-desorption of trace metal ions by kaolinite-bearing coal mining wastes in Upper Silesia and by smectite-bearing waste from a basalt quarry in Lower Silesia, both in Poland, were studied. Generally, at higher clay contents, the sorption on both kaolinite wastes followed the same sequence of efficiency: Cr similar to Zn>Pb>Cu>Ni >= Cd, while the sequence for the smectite waste was Zn>Pb>Cd>Cu >= Ni>Cr. The retention of the metal ions followed the same sequence for all clay-bearing wastes: Cr>Pb>Cu>Zn>Ni >= Cd. The sorption of the clay-bearing coal mining wastes was considerable, though the kaolinite and illite were the main components. There were no significant differences between both kaolinite-bearing wastes in the sorption/desorption capacity. In spite of this, the highest pH (approx. 8) of the KaW-1 kaolinite-bearing waste and the presence of iron (hydr)oxides may be crucial in explaining the observed differences. The clay waste samples showed similar retention for all metal ions except Pb. The highest retention was observed for Cr. Lead showed a lower retention, and the difference among clay wastes was noticeable. The amounts of metal ions sorbed and desorbed by the clay wastes depended on the type of clay waste, its composition and grain size, trace metal type and concentration, solid/solution (s/l) ratio, pH and the presence of other trace metal ions. It is concluded that in addition to adsorption, precipitation controlled the removal of trace metal ions from multimetal solutions. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据