4.3 Article

In vivo analysis of phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by testicular Sertoli cells

期刊

MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 71, 期 2, 页码 166-177

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.20278

关键词

apoptosis; phagocytosis; scavenger receptor; Sertoli cell; spermatogenesis; testis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sentoli cells, a somatic cell type present within the seminiferous tubules of testes, are responsible for the phagocytic elimination of apoptotic spermatogenic cells. We here established an in vivo assay system that enables us to quantitatively analyze Sertoli cell phagocytosis of apoptotic cells in testes of live mice. Apoptotic cells were injected into the seminiferous tubules of spermatogenic cell-depleted mice, and the occurrence of phagocytosis by Sertoli cells was examined by histochemically analyzing testis sections or dispersed testicular cells. We reproducibly observed similar levels of phagocytosis in either examination, and the ratio of Sertoli cells that engulfed injected apoptotic cells was almost the same between the two examinations. These results indicated that a quantitative in vivo assay system was established using the seminiferous tubules of live mice as 'test tubes.' We then determined the requirements for Sertoli cell phagocytosis of apoptotic cells using this assay. For this purpose, apoptotic cells were injected together with various phagocytosis inhibitors, and the extent of phagocytosis by Sertoli cells was determined. The results revealed that Sertoli cells phagocytose apoptotic cells in a manner dependent on class B scavenger receptor type I (SR-BI) of Sertoli cells and phosphatidylserine exposed at the surface of target cells, as previously observed in vitro using primary cultures of dispersed rat testicular cells. Furthermore, the amount of SR-BI in Sertoli cells increased after injection of apoptotic cells into the seminiferous tubules, suggesting a positive feedback regulation of the expression of this phagocytosis receptor. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据