4.7 Article

High-performance liquid chromatographic assay of phosphate and organophosphorus pesticides using a post-column photochemical reaction and fluorimetric detection

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 540, 期 2, 页码 383-391

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.03.055

关键词

high-performance liquid chromatography; organophosphorus pesticides; on-line photo-oxidation; molybdophosphoric acid reaction; fluorescence detection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sensitive method for the post-column reaction detection of organophosphorus pesticides is described. The method relies on photolysis of the organocompounds by irradiation with a low-pressure mercury lamp (main spectral line, 254 nm) in the presence of peroxydisulfate. The resultant orthophosphate was reacted with molybdate to form molybdophosphoric acid, which subsequently reacted with thiamine to generate thiochrome. Finally, the fluorescence intensity of thiochrome was measured at 440 nm with excitation at 375 nm. Factors affecting the rate of these reactions were optimized so that its contribution to the total band-broadening was negligible. This detection system was used for the determination of phosphate, acephate and methamidophos, which were separated on an ODS column by isocratic reversed phase chromatography with acetonitrile-water as the mobile phase. A linear relationship between analyte concentration and peak area was obtained within the range 0.016-7.0 mu g ml(-1) with correlation coefficients greater than 0.9995 and detection limits between 4 and 12 ng ml(-1). Intra- and inter-day precision values of about 1.2% R.S.D. (n=10) and 2.1% R.S.D. (n=30), respectively, were obtained. Pesticide residues below ng ml(-1) levels could be determined in environmental waters when a preconcentration device was coupled on-line with the HPLC system. Detection limits as low as 0.01 ng ml(-1) were achieved for only 250 ml of sample. In the analyses of vegetables and grains, the detection limit was about 1 mu g kg(-1). (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据