4.7 Article

Organo-montmorillonite barrier layers formed by combustion: Nanostructure and permeability

期刊

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
卷 49, 期 3, 页码 213-223

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2010.05.009

关键词

Montmorillonite; High temperature; X-ray diffraction; Permeability; Organo-montmorillonite

资金

  1. National Institute of Standards and Technologies [70NANB7H6006]
  2. Tennessee Technological University Center for Energy Systems Research
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self-assembly of nanoparticles into barrier layers has been the most cited theoretical explanation for the significant reduction in flammability often noted for polymer/montmorillonite nanocomposites. Both mass and heat transport reductions have been credited for such improvements, and in most cases a coupled mechanism is expected. To provide validation for early transport models, the structure of model barrier layers was investigated, these being produced by combustion of a homologous series of organo-montmorillonites. One model barrier layer was subjected to novel permeability analysis to obtain a flux, which will be useful in the evaluation of transport models. The effects of compatibilizer structure, temperature and pressure on barrier layer structure were examined. XRD versus TGA results suggest that the onset of chemical degradation and the onset of physical collapse on heating are correlated. Addition of pressure as low as 7 kPa affected the onset of structural collapse: for the case of a two-tailed dimethyl dialkyl quaternary ammonium ion compatibilized organo-montmorillonite this meant expansion of the basal spacing rather than the expected densification. Permeability of Ar through the ash was found to be a sensitive measure of structural change of high aspect ratio MMT nanoparticles. Actual fluxes ranged from 0.139 to 0.151 mol (m(2) s)(-1) for 0.5 mm thick samples. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据