4.8 Article

Survivin as a radioresistance factor, and prognostic and therapeutic target for radiotherapy in rectal cancer

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 65, 期 11, 页码 4881-4887

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3028

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Apoptosis levels have been shown to predict tumor response to preoperative radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer. Recently, the prominent role of survivin, a structurally unique member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein family, has been shown in colorectal cancer tumorigenesis and prognosis. In this study, we investigated whether survivin plays a direct role in mediating radiation resistance. We used short interfering RNA molecules to decrease survivin in radioresistant SW480 and intermediately radioresistant HCT-15 colorectal cancer cells. This resulted in a significant decrease of survivin mRNA and protein expression with a maximum at 24 to 48 hours after transfection. If irradiated during this sensitive period, an increased percentage of apoptotic cells and an increased caspase 3/7 activity in parallel with a decreased cell viability and a reduced clonogenic survival was shown. These effects were more pronounced in the radioresistant SW480 cell line with a radiation-induced cytotoxicity enhancement factor at 10% and 50% survival of 1.8 to 2.2 for SW480 and 1.5 to 1.7 for HCT-15, respectively. Furthermore, transfection with survivin short interfering RNA increased levels of G(2)-M arrest and levels of DNA double-strand breaks in irradiated cells. These observations indicate that cell cycle and DNA repair mechanisms may he associated with apoptosis induction in tumor cells that are otherwise resistant to killing by radiation. In a translational study of 59 patients with rectal cancer treated with a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, increased survivin expression was inversely related to the levels of apoptosis, and was also associated with a significantly higher risk of a local tumor recurrence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据