4.8 Article

Heterogeneous interface engineered atomic configuration on ultrathin Ni(OH)2/Ni3S2 nanoforests for efficient water splitting

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 242, 期 -, 页码 60-66

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.064

关键词

Heterogeneous interface; Ni(OH)(2)/Ni3S2 nanoforest; Electrocatalyst; Water splitting

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91534202, 91534122]
  2. Social Development Program of Shanghai [17DZ1200900]
  3. Shanghai Scientific and Technological Innovation Project [18JC1410600]
  4. National Program for Support of Top-Notch Young Professionals
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [222201718002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sluggish water dissociation kinetics of low-cost Ni3S2 electrocatalysts severely hinders the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), resulting in unsatisfied overall water splitting in alkaline media. Herein, we demonstrate the self-assembly of a new nanoforest electrocatalyst by ultrathin Ni(OH)(2)/Ni3S2 heterogeneous nanosheets (similar to 1.8 nm) using a high-temperature and large-potential electrodeposition technique. The surface atomic configuration of Ni3S2 is well-modulated by hetero-interface engineering with the Ni(OH)(2) cocatalyst, effectively accelerating the Volmer step and OH- adsorption during the HER without sacrificing the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). The resultant electrocatalysts exhibit superior and stable electrocatalytic activity toward the HER and OER in 1 M KOH with small overpotentials of 50 mV and 210 mV at 10 mA cm(-2), respectively. Using the Ni(OH)(2)/Ni3S2 nanoforest as dual-functional electrocatalysts, an alkaline electrolyzer can render 100 mA cm(-2) at a very low cell voltage of 1.64 V while keep stable for 120 hat 1.55 V, which outperforms the best report for Ni-based electrocatalysts. This finding gives a new insight into the modulating surface atomic configuration for achieving highly active electrocatalysts for water splitting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据