4.4 Review

Molecular analysis of human oral microbiota

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 277-285

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2005.00793.x

关键词

checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization; real-time polymerase chain reaction; 16S rRNA gene clone library; terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The application of molecular, mainly 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA)based approaches enables researchers to bypass the cultivation step and has proven its usefulness in studying the microbial composition in a variety of ecosystems, including the human oral cavity. In this mini-review, we describe the impact of the culture-independent approaches on our knowledge of the ecology of the human oral cavity and provide directions for future studies that should emphasize the role of specific strains, species and groups Of microbes in periodontal disease. Materials and methods: Recent findings are summarized to elucidate the relationship between periodontal disease and human oral microbiota, including as-yet-to-be-cultured organisms. Results: The real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was developed to detect and quantify periodontopathic bacteria, such as Actinobacillus actino-mycetemcomicans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Tannerella forsythensis (formerly Bacteroides forsythus) and Treponema denticola. The checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization technique allowed enumeration of large numbers of species in very large numbers of samples. 16S rRNA gene clone library analysis revea led the diversity of human oral microbiota and the existence of as-Vet-to-be-cultured organisms that are presumed periodontal pathogens. In addition, terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis was applied for assessment of diversity of human oral microbiota. Conclusion: Culture-independent approaches are useful for studying the microbial ecology in the human oral cavity and should be useful in the future to elucidate the etiology of periodontal disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据