4.6 Article

Survival condition for low-frequency quasi-one-dimensional breathers in a two-dimensional strongly anisotropic crystal

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 71, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.224303

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate a two-dimensional (2D) strongly anisotropic crystal (2D SAC) on substrate: 2D system of coupled linear chains of particles with strong intrachain and weak interchain interactions, each chain being subjected to the sine background potential. Nonlinear dynamics of one of these chains when the rest of them are fixed is reduced to the well known Frenkel-Kontorova (FK) model. Depending on strengh of the substrate, the 2D SAC models a variety of physical systems: polymer crystals with identical chains having light side groups, an array of inductively coupled long Josephson junctions, anisotropic crystals having light and heavy sublattices. Continuum limit of the FK model, the sine-Gordon (sG) equation, allows two types of soliton solutions: topological solitons and breathers. It is known that the quasi-one-dimensional topological solitons can propagate also in a chain of 2D system of coupled chains and even in a helix chain in a three-dimensional model of polymer crystal. In contrast to this, numerical simulation shows that the long-living breathers inherent to the FK model do not exist in the 2D SAC with weak background potential. The effect changes scenario of kink-antikink collision with small relative velocity: at weak background potential the collision always results only in intensive phonon radiation while kink-antikink recombination in the FK model results in long-living low-frequency sG breather creation. We found the survival condition for breathers in the 2D SAC on substrate depending on breather frequency and strength of the background potential. The survival condition bears no relation to resonances between breather frequency and frequencies of phonon band-contrary to the case of the FK model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据