4.8 Article

Study on the separation mechanisms of photogenerated electrons and holes for composite photocatalysts g-C3N4-WO3

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 150, 期 -, 页码 564-573

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.12.053

关键词

Composite photocatalyst; g-C3N4-WO3; Photoexcited carriers; Transport process; Reaction mechanisms

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [20973071, 51172086, 51272081, 21103060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The separation mechanisms of photogenerated electrons and holes for composite photocatalysts have been a research focus. In this paper, the composite g-C3N4-WO3 photocatalysts with different main parts of C3N4 or WO3 were prepared by ball milling and heat treatment methods. The photocatalytic performance was evaluated by degradation of methylene blue (MB) and fuchsin (BF) under visible light illumination. The photocatalyst was characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), UV-vis diffuse reflection spectroscopy (DRS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) methods. The separation mechanisms of photogenerated electrons and holes of the g-C3N4-WO3 photocatalysts were investigated by electron spin resonance technology (ESR), photoluminescence technique (PL), and determination of reactive species in the photocatalytic reactions. When the main part of the g-C3N4-WO3 photocatalyst is WO3 (namely g-C3N4/WO3), the transport process of the photogenerated electrons and holes adopts the generic band-band transfer. Meanwhile, g-C3N4 is covered by WO3 powder, and the role of g-C3N4 can not be played fully. The photocatalytic activity of the photocatalyst is not obviously increased. However, when the primary part of the WO3-g-C3N4 photocatalyst is g-C3N4 (namely WO3/g-C3N4), the migration of photogenerated electrons and holes exhibits a typical characteristic of Z-scheme photocatalyst, and the photocatalytic activity of the photocatalyst is increased greatly. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据