4.8 Article

Measurement of solution-phase chiral molecular recognition in the gas phase using electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 77, 期 11, 页码 3660-3670

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac050137d

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Development of chiral selectors (SOs) is important both for understanding chiral molecular recognition processes and for their use in the separation of chiral species (selectands). Their evaluation by chromatographic procedures (e.g., as chiral stationary phase) can, however, be time-consuming. In this respect, electrospray ionization-MS (ESI-MS) is tested here as a possible alternative for screening enantioselective binding by SOs. The set of well-characterized cinchona alkaloid SOs are investigated with respect to their enantioselective binding to a set of model enantiomers, dinitrobenzoyl-(R)- and dinitrobenzoyl-(S)-leucine. MS-based enantioselectivity values from normalized gas-phase ion abundances for the diastereomeric complexes are compared empirically to chromatographic (HPLC) enantioselectivity results and shown to be consistent. Investigations into the fundamentals of measuring unbiased enantioselectivity values in the limit of dilute solution by correlation between experimental and modeled theoretical data are shown. Titration experiments are used to extract binding constants and are compared with published calorimetric (ITC) data. Results show that while the magnitude of binding affinities determined for various diastereomeric complexes is attenuated, the relative ranking and stereochemical preference in binding are consistently reproduced. This work represents a fundamental study of solution- versus gas-phase correlation for enantioselective systems by ESI-MS and indicates that, although not all questions and assumptions can be clearly engaged, for these enthalpically driven binding systems, the relative degree of binding affinity and selectivity is preserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据