4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

CK2 as a positive regulator of Wnt signalling and tumourigenesis

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 274, 期 1-2, 页码 63-67

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11010-005-3078-0

关键词

breast cancer; casein kinase II; glycogen synthase kinase 3; GSK3; protein kinase CK2; Wnt signalling

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA71796, T32 CA064070] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [P01 ES11624] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CK2 is upregulated in rapidly dividing cells including most human tumours. Transgenic overexpression of CK2 in lymphoid or mammary lineages predisposes to transformation. Multiple signalling and oncogene pathways could be regulated by CK2 in this process. Our studies suggest that phosphorylation of critical oncogenes by CK2, as well as by other serine-threonine kinases, regulates their stability via susceptibility to the proteasomal degradation system. beta-catenin is a transcriptional co-factor in the Wnt signalling pathway that is regulated in this fashion. Inactivating mutations in the adenomatosis polyposis coli (APC) gene, which encodes a carrier protein for beta-catenin, or stabilizing mutations in beta-catenin itself, frequently occur in human tumours. CK2 and the monomeric serine-threonine kinase GSK3 have opposing actions on beta-catenin: GSK-3 phosphorylation of the N-terminus of beta-catenin promotes degradation; while phosphorylation by CK2 in the armadillo repeat protein interaction domain protects it. beta-catenin is overexpressed in mammary tumours occurring in mice transgenic for CK2 or a dominant negative form of GSK3, and also in mammary tumours arising following treatment with the environmental carcinogen DMBA. Experiments are underway to determine whether expression of both CK2 and kinase inactive GSK3 further accelerates tumorigenesis. Inhibitors of GSK3 under development for treatment of diabetes could promote tumours, while CK2 inhibitors should be useful agents for treatment of cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据