4.6 Article

Oxygen ionic and electronic transport in apatite-type La10-x(Si,Al)6O26±δ

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
卷 178, 期 6, 页码 2050-2061

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2005.04.018

关键词

lanthanum silicate; apatite; solid oxide electrolyte; oxygen ionic conductivity; electronic transport; faradaic efficiency; ion transference number; thermal expansion; Seebeck coefficient

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main factor governing the oxygen ionic conductivity in apatite-type La10-xSi6-yAlyO27-3O27-3x/2-y/2 = (x = 0-0.33; y = 0.5- 1.5) is the concentration of mobile interstitials determined by the total oxygen content. The ion transference numbers, measured by modified faradaic efficiency technique., vary in the range 0.9949-0.9997 in air and increase on reducing oxygen partial pressure due to decreasing p-type electronic conduction. The activation energies for ionic and hole transport are (56-67)+/- 3kJ/mol and (57-100)+/- 8 kJ/mol, respectively. Increasing oxygen content leads to hi-her hole conduction in oxidizing atmospheres and promotes minor oxygen losses from the lattice when the oxygen pressure decreases, although the overall level of ionic conductivity is almost constant in the p(O-2) range from 50 kPa down to 10(-16) Pa. Under reducing conditions at temperatures above 1100 K. silicon oxide volatilization from the surface layers of apatite ceramics results in a moderate decrease of the conductivity with time. This suggests that the operation of electrochemical cells with silicate-based solid electrolytes should be limited to the intermediate-temperature range, such Lis 800-1000 K, where the ionic transport in most-conductive apatite phases containing 26.50-26.75 oxygen atoms per unit formula is higher than that in stabilized zirconia. The average thermal expansion coefficients of apatite ceramics, calculated from dilatometric data in air, are (8.7-10.8) x 10(-6) K-1 at 300-1300 K. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据