4.6 Review

Mixed lineage kinase-c-jun N-terminal kinase signaling pathway: A new therapeutic target in Parkinson's disease

期刊

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 653-664

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.20390

关键词

apoptosis; programmed cell death; neurodegeneration; neuroprotection

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 26836, NS 38370] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is growing evidence that the molecular pathways of programmed cell death play a role in neurodegenerative disease, including Parkinson's disease, so there has been increased interest in them as therapeutic targets for the development of neuroprotective strategies. One pathway of cell death that has attracted particular attention is the mixed lineage kinase (MLK) -c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling cascade, which leads to the phosphorylation and activation of the transcription factor c-jun. There is much evidence, from in vitro and in vivo studies, that this cascade can mediate cell death. In addition, there is evidence that it is operative upstream in the death process. It is possible that abrogation of this pathway may forestall death before irreversible cellular injury. One class of compounds that has shown promise for their ability to block cell death by inhibiting this cascade are the inhibitors of the MLKs, which are upstream in the activation of c-jun. One of these compounds, CEP1347, is now in a Phase II/III clinical trial for neuroprotection in PD. Whether this trial is successful or not, this signaling cascade is likely to be a focus of future therapeutic development. This review, therefore, outlines the principles of signaling within this kinase pathway, and the evidence for its role in cell death. We review the evidence that inhibition of the MLKs can prevent dopamine neuron cell death and the degeneration of their axons. These studies suggest important future directions for the development of therapies that will target this important cell death pathway. (c) 2005 Movement Disorder Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据