4.4 Article

Breakdown of the blood-brain barrier to proteins in white matter of the developing brain following systemic inflammation

期刊

CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH
卷 320, 期 3, 页码 369-378

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-005-1088-6

关键词

blood-brain barrier; blood-CSF barrier; cerebrospinal fluid; acute-phase response; lipopolysaccharide; rat (Sprague Dawley); South American opossum (Monodelphis domestica)

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS043949] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compromised blood-brain barrier permeability resulting from systemic inflammation has been implicated as a possible cause of brain damage in fetuses and newborns and may underlie white matter damage later in life. Rats at postnatal day (P) 0, P8 and P20 and opossums (Monodelphis domestica) at P15, P20, P35, P50 and P60 and adults of both species were injected intraperitoneally with 0.2-10 mg/kg body weight of 055:B5 lipopolysaccharide. An acute-phase response occurred in all animals. A change in the permeability of the blood-brain barrier to plasma proteins during a restricted period of postnatal development in both species was determined immunocytochemically by the presence of proteins surrounding cerebral blood vessels and in brain parenchyma. Blood vessels in white matter, but not grey matter, became transiently permeable to proteins between 10 and 24 h after lipopolysaccharide injection in P0 and P8 rats and P35-P60 opossums. Brains of Monodelphis younger than P35, rats older than P20 and adults of both species were not affected. Permeability of the blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier to proteins was not affected by systemic inflammation for at least 48 h after intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide. These results show that there is a restricted period in brain development when the blood-brain barrier, but not the blood-CSF barrier, to proteins is susceptible to systemic inflammation; this does not appear to be attributable to barrier immaturity but to its stage of development and only occurs in white matter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据