4.6 Article

Epstein-Barr virus LMP2A alters in vivo and in vitro models of B-cell anergy, but not deletion, in response to autoantigen

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 79, 期 12, 页码 7355-7362

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.79.12.7355-7362.2005

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA103375-02, CA09560, R01 CA093444, F32 CA103375, T32 CA009560, R01 CA062234, CAS73507, CA93444, CA62234] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE13127, R01 DE013127] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A significant percentage of the population latently harbors Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in B cells. One EBV-encoded protein, latent membrane protein 2A (LMP2A), is expressed in tissue culture models of EBV latent infection, in human infections, and in many of the EBV-associated proliferative disorders. LMP2A constitutively activates proteins involved in the B-cell receptor (BCR) signal transduction cascade and inhibits the antigen-induced activation of these proteins. In the present study, we investigated whether LMP2A alters B-cell receptor signaling in primary B cells in vivo and in vitro. LMP2A does not inhibit antigen-induced tolerance in response to strong stimuli in an in vivo tolerance model in which B cells are reactive to self-antigen. In contrast, LMP2A bypasses anergy induction in response to low levels of soluble hen egg lysozyme (HEL) both in vivo and in vitro as determined by the ability of LMP2A-expressing HEL-specific B cells to proliferate and induce NF-kappa B nuclear translocation after exposure to low levels of antigen. Furthermore, LMP2A induces NF-kappa B nuclear translocation independent of BCR cross-linking. Since NF-kappa B is required to bypass tolerance induction, this LMP2A-dependent NF-kappa B activation may complete the tolerogenic signal induced by low levels of soluble HEL. Overall, the findings suggest that LMP2A may not inhibit BCR-induced signals under all conditions as previously suggested by studies with EBV immortalized B cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据