4.7 Article

Comparative actions of clomazone on β-carotene levels and growth in rice (Oryza sativa) and watergrasses (Echinochloa spp)

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 61, 期 6, 页码 567-571

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.1007

关键词

clomazone; rice watergrass; beta-carotene; growth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seedlings of rice, early watergrass (thiobencarb-resistant and thiobencarb-susceptible biotypes, R and S, respectively), and late watergrass (thiobencarb-resistant and thiobencarb-susceptible biotypes, R and S, respectively) were hydroponically exposed to clomazone at concentrations ranging from 0.08 to 7.9 mu m. Whole-plant growth (mg fresh wt) and beta-carotene concentrations (mu g g(-1) fresh wt) were measured after a 7-day exposure period. For growth, the no observed effect concentrations (NOECs) were 7.9, 0.21, 0.21, 0.46 and 0.46 mu m clomazone for rice, early watergrass (R), early watergrass (S), late watergrass (R) and late watergrass (S), respectively, while the concentrations causing 25% inhibition in response (IC25) were 5.6 (+/- 1.6), 0.46 (+/- 0.06), 0.42 (+/- 0.08), 0.92 (+/- 0.45) and 0.79 ( 0.08) gm clomazone, respectively. Clomazone inhibits beta-carotene synthesis via inhibition of the non-mevalonate isoprenoid synthetic pathway. For assessment of clomazone effects, beta-carotene levels proved to be a more sensitive toxicological endpoint than growth. For rice, early watergrass (R), early watergrass (S), late watergrass (R) and late watergrass (S), the beta-carotene NOECs were 0.21, < 0.08, < 0.08, 0.08 and 0.46 mu m clomazone respectively, while IC25 values were 0.42 (+/- 0.26), 0.08 (+/- 0.02), 0.08 (+/- 0.02), 0.33 (+/- 0.09) and 0.54 (+/- 0.15) gm, respectively. No evidence was found that the thiobencarb-resistance mechanisms present in early and late watergrasses impart resistance to clomazone. Due to similar sensitivity between rice and late watergrass, use of clomazone in rice culture will require the use of a safening technique. (c) 2005 Society of Chemical Industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据