4.8 Article

Influence of the preparation method on the activity of ceria zirconia mixed oxides for naphthalene total oxidation

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 132, 期 -, 页码 98-106

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.11.036

关键词

VOCs; Catalytic oxidation; Ceria; Zirconia; Naphthalene; PAHs

资金

  1. Cardiff University
  2. CAI Programa Europa XXI
  3. Ministry of Science and Innovation (Spain)
  4. Plan E [ENE2009-11353]
  5. CSIC for his Ramon y Cajal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cerium/zirconium mixed oxides, with different Ce/Zr ratios, have been synthesised by a co-precipitation method using two different precipitating agents (sodium carbonate and urea) and tested for the total oxidation of naphthalene. Catalysts were characterised by N-2 adsorption, XRD, Raman, TPR, XPS and DRIFTS. Ceria prepared by carbonate precipitation had low activity and this is likely to be related to the high concentration of residual surface carbonate that covers catalytic sites and inhibits reaction. For carbonate precipitation, increasing the Zr content to 1% resulted in a significant increase of activity, which is related to the decrease of surface carbonate. Increasing the Zr content up to 50% resulted in catalysts more active than ceria, but activity decreased as Zr content increased. This was in spite of increasing the number of oxygen vacancies, and this effect has been related to the decrease in the number of surface hydroxyl groups, which favours naphthalene adsorption. Ceria prepared by urea precipitation was markedly more active than that produced by carbonate precipitation. The urea-derived catalyst with 1%Zr is marginally more active than pure ceria, whilst for higher Zr contents activity was marginally lower. Two factors can account for these observations; they are the increase of oxygen vacancies contributing positively to activity and the opposing negative effect of decreasing the number of surface hydroxyl groups when the zirconium content increases. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据