4.7 Article

The removal of hydrogen sulfide from gas streams using an aqueous metal sulfate absorbent - Part II. The regeneration of copper sulfide to copper oxide - an experimental study

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 199-213

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2004.10.012

关键词

high temperature oxidation; copper sulfide oxidation; reaction mechanism; thermogravimetric analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim of this study was to investigate the possibilities for a selective and efficient method to convert copper(II) sulfide (CuS) into copper(II) oxide (CuO). The oxidation of copper sulfide has been studied experimentally using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) at temperatures ranging from 450 to 750 degrees C and oxygen concentrations of 5 and 10 vol.%. It appeared that the products formed upon the oxidation of copper sulfide depend on the reaction temperature. However, in all cases the conversion time using the powdered samples was much shorter than expected based on literature results (typically 3 min versus 1-3 h as mentioned in literature). The first reaction step in the oxidation of copper sulfide always was the fast decomposition of CuS into Cu2S and gaseous sulfur, which immediately was oxidized further to SO2. Subsequently, Cu2S was then oxidized, the route depending on the reaction conditions. Oxidation experiments carried out at various temperatures showed that Cu2S was oxidized selectively to CuO at temperatures above 650 degrees C, while at temperatures below 650 degrees C (basic) copper sulfate was also formed. The oxidation from Cu2S to CuO appeared to be the result of two consecutive reactions. Cu2S is first converted into Cu2O, which is subsequently oxidized to CuO. The experimental results allowed for the determination of the intrinsic kinetic rate expression and (Arrhenius) relation for the reaction rate constant of the conversion of Cu2S to Cu2O between 650 and 750 degrees C and oxygen concentrations between 5 and 10 vol. %. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据