4.8 Article

CO2 methanation on Rh/γ-Al2O3 catalyst at low temperature: In situ supply of hydrogen by Ni/activated carbon catalyst

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 41-50

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.05.019

关键词

CO2; Methanation; Rhodium; gamma-Al2O3; Nickel; Hydrogen spill-over

资金

  1. Direction Generale des Technologies, de la Recherche et de l'Energie (DGTRE) of the Region Wallonne (Belgium)
  2. Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS) of Belgium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nowadays, the control of CO2 emissions is still a challenge. A few alternatives exist but nothing concrete seems to be developed. Instead of catching and storing CO2, one possibility would be its transformation into value added molecules as methane. Rhodium catalysts are active in CO2 methanation reaction. But it seems that a competitive adsorption exist between the two reactants: CO2 and hydrogen. In order to surpass this trouble and increase hydrogen adsorption, a known active catalyst in methanation (Rh/gamma-Al2O3) was put into contact with a known active catalyst in hydrogen activation (Ni/activated carbon). Catalysts were prepared by the mechanical mixing of the latter two in different proportions. Catalysts were tested in the low temperature methanation reaction using CO2 and H-2. Methane is produced in all cases with a 100% of selectivity. A significant synergy appears in the catalytic activity of this mixed catalyst. Production of methane in mixtures is largely higher than the theoretical predicted values considering the individual performances. Catalysts were characterized before and after reaction by ICP-AES, N-2 physisorption, XRD, CO2 chemisorption, ToF-SIMS, XPS and TPR. The synergy is due to the increase of H-2 adsorption and promoting the carbon hydride formation. Furthermore the suggested hydrogen spill-over maintains Rh particles in a metallic state necessary for the reaction. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier BM. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据