4.6 Article

Arginine synthesis does not occur during first-pass hepatic metabolism in the neonatal piglet

期刊

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00530.2004

关键词

proline; arginine biosynthesis; first-pass metabolism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have shown that first-pass intestinal metabolism is necessary for similar to 50% of whole body arginine synthesis from its major precursor proline in neonatal piglets. Furthermore, the intestine is not the site of increased arginine synthesis observed during dietary arginine deficiency. Primed constant intravenous (iv) and intraportal (ip) infusions of L-[U-C-14]proline, and iv infusion of either L-[guanido-C-14]arginine or L-[4,5-H-3]arginine were used to measure first-pass hepatic arginine synthesis in piglets enterally fed either deficient (0.20 g.kg(-1).day(-1)) or generous (1.80 g.kg(-1).day(-1)) quantities of arginine for 5 days. Conversion of arginine to other urea cycle intermediates and arginine recycling were also calculated for both dietary treatments. Arginine synthesis (g.kg(-1).day(-1)) from proline was greater in piglets (P < 0.05) fed the deficient arginine diet in both the presence (generous: 0.07; deficient: 0.17; pooled SE = 0.01) and absence (generous: 0.06; deficient: 0.20; pooled SE = 0.01) of first-pass hepatic metabolism. There was no net arginine synthesis from proline during first-pass hepatic metabolism regardless of arginine intake. Arginine conversion to urea, citrulline, and ornithine was significantly greater (P < 0.05) in piglets fed the generous arginine diet. Calculated arginine fluxes were significantly lower (P = 0.01) for [4,5-H-3]arginine than for [guanido-C-14]arginine, and the discrepancy between the values was greater in piglets fed the deficient arginine diet (35% vs. 20%). Collectively, these findings show that first-pass hepatic metabolism is not a site of net arginine synthesis and that piglets conserve dietary arginine in times of deficiency by decreasing hydrolysis and increasing recycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据