4.6 Article

A system to detect houses and residential street networks in multispectral satellite images

期刊

COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING
卷 98, 期 3, 页码 423-461

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2004.10.006

关键词

vegetation and shadow water indices; clustering spatial coherence; binary balloon algorithm; graph theory; shortest path algorithm.; house detection; road detection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maps are vital tools for most government agencies and consumers. However, their Manual generation and updating is tedious, time consuming, and expensive. To address these concerns. we are developing automated techniques. In this paper, we restrict our attention to residential regions. These regions provide a challenge, testing the Current limits Of automated ima0e analysis. Such regions are also typically areas of rapid growth and development and, therefore. are of interest from the applications perspective. In previous Studies, we introduced statistical measures to extract these kinds of regions from satellite images [in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, 2002, p. 127, IEEE Trans. GeoRS (2003). IEEE Trans. PAMI]. As the next step toward automatic map generation, here we introduce a novel system to detect houses and street networks in IKONOS multispectral images. These images have one meter panchromatic resolution with 4 m resolution in the spectral hands. Our system consists of four major components: multitispectral analysis to detect cultural activity, segmentation of regions of possible human activity (based on the surface material), decomposition of the segmented images, and graph theoretical algorithms over the decompositions to extract the street network and to detect houses. We tested our system on a large and diverse data set. Our results indicate the usefulness of our system in detecting houses and street networks, hence generating automated maps. (c) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据