4.7 Article

Epigaflocatechin gallate (EGCG) (TEAVIGO™) does not impair nonhaem-iron absorption in man

期刊

PHYTOMEDICINE
卷 12, 期 6-7, 页码 410-415

出版社

URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2004.07.001

关键词

green tea catechins; epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG); iron absorption; randomized; double blind; placebo-controlled 3 periods cross over study in man

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A number of studies have shown that tea catechins can inhibit intestinal iron absorption, mostly iron in the nonhaem form. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-periods cross-over study examined the degree of inhibition of nonhaem iron absorption by pure crystalline epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG). The study was designed to show the maximum inhibitory action of EGCG by selecting 30 healthy women with low iron stores. Treatments were 150mg, 300mg EGCG and placebo each for 8 consecutive study days with a wash-out period of 14 days between treatments. Iron incorporation was assessed by supplying Fe-57 orally and Fe-58 intravenously. Differences in fractional nonhaem iron absorption between the treatments were evaluated by using two-sided ANOVA. Results showed a relative nonhaem iron absorption reduction of 14% with 150mg EGCG and 27% for 300mg EGCG treatment compared to placebo. Differences were statistically significant (p <= 0.05) between the placebo and the 300 mg EGCG treatments and between the 150 and 300mg EGCG treatments. The inverse relation between EGCG dose and fractional nonhaem iron absorption was linear (p = 0.0002). In this study the magnitude of the inhibitory action of EGCG on nonhaem iron absorption was found to be much lower than that reported in the literature for black tea and similar compounds. The doses of EGCG in supplements, which will be lower than those used in this study, are not expected to have any health relevant effects on iron absorption in subjects with normal iron stores. (c) 2005 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据