4.8 Article

Water splitting on Rhodamine-B dye sensitized Co-doped TiO2 catalyst under visible light

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 111, 期 -, 页码 397-401

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.10.023

关键词

TiO2 nanoparticles; Rhodamine B dye; Dye sensitization; Photocatalyst; Water splitting

资金

  1. Ministry of Knowledge Economy
  2. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) [20104010100660]
  3. National Research Foundation (NRF), Korea [2011-0029527]
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20104010100660] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0029527] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An effective rhodamine B (Rh B) dye sensitized Co doped TiO2 (Co/TiO2) materials was prepared by simple physical absorption for photocatalytic water splitting under visible light. The prepared Rh B-Co/TiO2 materials showed a strong absorbance edge band in the range of 450-600 nm (max. absorbance at 550 nm) and estimated a moderate band gap of 2.58 eV, which lowered than that of Co/TiO2 (2.75 eV). Rh B-Co/TiO2 catalysts showed the high activity towards photocatalytic water splitting under visible light irradiation. The reaction with Rh B-Co/TiO2 catalysts achieved a nearly stoichiometic evolution of H-2 and O-2 evolution of similar to 227.3 mu mol/g-catal/h and similar to 98.9 mu mol/g-catal/h, respectively, which is 6 times higher than that of H-2 evolution (similar to 37.67 mu mol/g-catal/h) over Co/TiO2 catalysts. The enhanced water splitting reaction may be facilitated by the absorbed Rh B near to Co atom. This synergic effect between the Rh B and Co is crucial to the water splitting reaction. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据