4.4 Article

In vitro-in vivo extrapolation of CYP2D6 inactivation by paroxetine: Prediction of nonstationary pharmacokinetics and drug interaction magnitude

期刊

DRUG METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 845-852

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/dmd.105.004077

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Attempts at predicting drug-drug interactions perpetrated by paroxetine from in vitro data have utilized reversible enzyme inhibition models and have been unsuccessful to date, grossly underpredicting interaction magnitude. Recent data have provided evidence for mechanism-based inactivation of CYP2D6 by paroxetine. We have predicted the pharmacokinetic consequences of CYP2D6 inactivation by paroxetine from in vitro inactivation kinetics ( k(inact) 0.17 min(-1), unbound K-I 0.315 mu M), in vivo inhibitor concentrations, and an estimated CYP2D6 degradation half-life of 51 h, using a mathematical model of mechanism-based inhibition. The model-predicted accumulation ratio of paroxetine was 5 times that expected from single-dose kinetics and in excellent agreement with the observed 5- to 6-fold greater accumulation. Magnitudes of interactions produced by paroxetine ( 20 - 30 mg/day) with desipramine, risperidone, perphenazine, atomoxetine, (S)-metoprolol, and ( R)metoprolol were predicted, considering the contribution of CYP2D6 to their oral clearance. Predicted fold-increases in victim drug AUC were 5-, 6-, 5-, 6-, 4-, and 6- fold, respectively, and are in reasonable agreement with observed values of 5-, 6-, > 7-, 7-, 5-, and 8-fold, respectively. Failure to consider microsomal binding in vitro adversely affected predictive accuracy. Simulation of the sensitivities of these predictions to model inputs suggests a 2-fold underprediction of interaction magnitude when a CYP2D6 degradation half-life of 14 h ( reported for rat CYP3A) is used. In summary, the scaling model for mechanism-based inactivation successfully predicted the pharmacokinetic consequences of CYP2D6 inactivation by paroxetine from in vitro data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据