4.6 Article

Increased placebo analgesia over time in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients is associated with desire and expectation but not endogenous opioid mechanisms

期刊

PAIN
卷 115, 期 3, 页码 338-347

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.03.014

关键词

placebo; opioids; naloxone; expectation; desire

资金

  1. NCCIH NIH HHS [R01AT 1424] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study was conducted to determine whether changes in expected pain levels, desire for pain relief. or anxiety contribute to an increase in placebo analgesia over time as well as to determine whether placebo analgesic effects of IBS patients are related to endogenous opioid mechanisms. Twenty-six women with IBS were exposed to rectal stimulation (35 or 55 mmHg for 30 s) and tested under natural history (NH), rectal placebo (RP) and rectal lidocaine (RL) conditions. During all conditions, 16 patients were given saline intravenously (to test for a placebo effect) and 10 patients were given naloxone intravenously (to test naloxone antagonism of the placebo effect) on a double blind basis. Patients rated expected pain level, desire for pain relief and anxiety at 2 and 22 min after the onset of NH. RP. and RL conditions and they rated actual pain intensity at 5-min intervals for 40 min. There was a large and significant placebo effect W < 0.001) that increased over time. Ratings of expected pain levels, desire for pain relief and anxiety decreased over time and contributed to more variance in placebo and lidocaine responses during the last half of the session. These changes suggest that a reduction in negative emotions may be central to placebo effects. There was no significant difference between psychological mediators (desire. expectation, anxiety) or the placebo effect in the saline and naloxone groups, indicating that neither the psychological mediators nor the placebo analgesic effect were associated with endogenous opioids in this clinically related paradigm. (c) 2005 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据