4.5 Article

Phytoestrogen exposure elevates PTEN levels

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 1457-1463

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddi155

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30CA16058] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epidemiological data suggest that consumption of phytoestrogens can be protective against the development of breast cancer. It may be logical to postulate that phytoestrogens may regulate proteins that control cellular division, such as the tumor suppressor PTEN. Germline, and more significantly, somatic PTEN mutations have been observed in a broad range of human cancers, especially those of the breast. Active PTEN results in decreased phosphorylation of Akt and MAPK, the up-regulation of p27 and down-regulation of cyclin D1 protein levels resulting in decreased proliferation and an increase in apoptosis. We hypothesized that phytoestrogen exposure regulates PTEN protein expression in the breast cancer cell line, MCF-7. When MCF-7 cells were stimulated with resveratrol, quercetin or genistein, there was an increase in PTEN protein levels. Concomitantly, phytoestrogen stimulation resulted in decreased Akt phosphorylation and an increase in p27 protein levels, indicating active PTEN lipid phosphatase activity. In contrast, we found that MAPK phosphorylation and cyclin D1 levels, which are regulated by PTEN's protein phosphatase activity, were not altered. Using semi-quantitative RT-PCR, we found that mRNA levels were slightly increased in cells stimulated by phytoestrogens, suggesting that the mechanism for increased PTEN protein expression is dependent upon transcription. Concurrently, our data provide evidence that a mechanism for phytoestrogens' protective nature is partially through increased PTEN expression. More importantly, it provides a novel target for the regulation of PTEN expression and suggests that dietary changes may be adjunctive to traditional preventive and therapeutic strategies against breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据