4.8 Article

Catalytic steam reforming of biomass tar over iron- or nickel-based catalyst supported on calcined scallop shell

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 115, 期 -, 页码 159-168

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.12.009

关键词

Biomass; Pruned apple branch; Tar; Catalytic steam reforming; Scallop shell; Iron; Nickel; CaO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calcined scallop shell (CS) exhibits alkaline property with a porous structure, and could be applied for the adsorption and decomposition of biomass-derived tar. In this study, steam reforming of tar derived from pruned apple branch over CS was investigated in a fixed bed at 650 degrees C. It was found that CS had good activity for the steam reforming of tar to produce synthesis gas (syngas), and was able to be recycled. To promote the gas production efficiency, iron or nickel was supported on the CS, and used for the reforming of tar. The effect of heating rate on the gas production rate was investigated, and it was found that reduced iron- or nickel-supported CS showed better activities under the condition of rapid heating. Iron- or nickel-based catalyst in its oxide state was also investigated for the reforming of tar. No catalytic activity was found at the beginning, but good activity appeared after approximately 30 min of reaction when the metal oxide was reduced to its metallic form by the initially generated syngas (CO and H-2) from the pyrolysis of biomass without the aid of catalyst. Iron and nickel in their metallic forms rather than their oxide ones were considered as active sites for the reforming of tar. Furthermore, the alkaline elements in the biomass, which could enhance the activity of the catalysts, were identified to be accumulated on the surface of the catalysts with the biomass-derived tar. As a result, a larger amount of syngas was produced when the regenerated catalysts were applied. Based on these experimental results, a possible catalytic process was proposed. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据